Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Snowden, Whistle-blower or Traitor?

This movie tells the story that we all know, or think we know, about American fugitive Edward Snowden. From his early years in the Army to fleeing from the United States government, this biographical drama tells the story of how Snowden became an enemy of the State. The film starts back in 2003 with Edward being discharged from the Army, after he breaks his leg, rendering him unfit to serve his country. He later finds other ways to serve the United States. The somewhat relatable Snowden goes through many internal and external conflicts, most of them including his girlfriend, Lindsey. Snowden gives an inside look to his relationship with his girlfriend, who he met online. He starts out at a school for technology training for the CIA, where he meets two of his mentors that he will keep in contact with over many years. He moves from job to job in the Central Intelligence Agency to the National Security Agency where he becomes a contractor. Through his time, he learns of many secret projects that the government is putting into place on the American people, watching them through the means of their webcams. He even finds out that the government is watching him and the people he loves. After many years dealing with the most classified information and using the best technology, he decides to leak what he has learned. Is he a hero or a traitor?   
Back in 2013, everyone knew about Edward Snowden and what he had done, even myself. Mostly everyone around me told me he was a bad man that just wanted attention and that he was crazy. After seeing this film, I think otherwise. Snowden really takes you back to where it all began for the ex-NSA analyst. It goes into details about his work and how he got to be where he is now. I think that was one of the strongest points of the film, was how detailed it really was about Snowden’s life, and explains things you otherwise wouldn’t know about. It gives you an inside look at what government programs are in place to keep an eye on not only foreign threats but also the American people. In an article written about the movie included in the New York Times, A.O Scott says that the director “tells a story from slightly faded headlines, filling in some details you may have forgotten.” (Oliver Stone’s Restrained Portrait of a Whistle-Blower, Scott) The plot of this movie can be slow moving at times, but you get many details that you otherwise wouldn’t. One detail includes Snowden’s relationship with his girlfriend Lindsey, which I think plays an important part in the movie. It shows what was as=t stake for Snowden when he went to the media with what he knew. The film also shows the struggles between the couple as he moves from job to job around the world. This movie really didn’t amaze me, but it definitely got me thinking about what our government may be doing to the American people and to people around the world. And because of that, I do think it is a decent movie because it really does make you think. Another strength of this movie is that they actually include the real Edward Snowden at the end of the movie, as he talks to a lecture hall via webcam from his home in Moscow, where he went to seek asylum from the government. It makes him as a person very real, which adds realness to the movie.
            This movie fits into a relatively new subgenre of film called a biographical drama based on recent events. It is based on true events, but some are dramatized to make them more interesting. The events of Edward Snowden leaking secret information took place in 2013, making it a very recent event. It adds a whole new level to the genre of biographical films. These types of movies can put many new details into something that happened recently, and make you rethink what you thought happened during that time. It could be a film about a hacker turned whistle-blower or the killing of Osama Bin Laden by Seal Team Six as portrayed in the film Zero Dark Thirty. Both of these films fit into the same genre of biographical dramas about a recent event.  
The theme of this film has to do with the governments use of public surveillance, and what is being kept from the American people. The theme stays the same throughout the whole movie. The theme starts being shown when Snowden finds out about a web interface that can search for anyone and anything, and can hack into webcams on laptops and watch what people are doing. The theme also turns political, with the whole movie talking about the U.S government and its programs, including the CIA and NSA. That continues throughout, even when he finally releases the information about the top secret programs that the American government has, and also the British governments capabilities of surveillance.  
            This movie is full of cultural context. In this day and age, technology is a huge part of everyone’s lives. Our whole lives are run through a screen. Technology is advancing every day, and the government isn’t lagging behind. I am sure that there is even more programs and policies put in place since 2013 that still put many people under the governments radar. In 2013, Snowden leaked “over 150 articles to 23 news organizations.” (New Film Tells the Story of Edward Snowden; Here Are the Surveillance Programs He Helped Expose, McLaughlin and Cooper) That put into perspective how much the government knows about everyday people. Snowden knows that his girlfriend is being watched through the webcam on her laptop, and eventually his whole house becomes bugged with ways to spy on him. This type of spying is also shown when him and a man he works with hack into an Indian banker’s daughter webcam, also through her laptop, with no problems at all. That’s the way the world is now with technology moving forward so rapidly. Today, anyone and everyone can hack into anything. Just last week, someone hacked into the Yahoo! data base and hacked into over 500 million accounts. Another way this movie shows how our culture is now, is a real video shown during the film of the director of the NSA lying to Congress when asked, “Does the government have programs that are spying on the American people?” and he responds with no. It shows where our government is, and how they will lie no matter what. In all, the movie itself really shows the state of our nation, and shows the advancement of technology over time.
            Overall I thought this movie wasn’t very good or exciting, but it definitely made you think. It also takes you back to the time when all of this was actually going on with Edward Snowden, and how much the media likes to stretch the truth about subjects and wants to make some people to be the bad guy, even when no one knows the whole story. The film didn’t blow me away, but it gave me new insight to the events of Edward’s life from the early 2000’s to now. It made him a relatable person, showing his relationship with his girlfriend and his conflict with himself, wondering if he should go public with the intel that he knew about, even knowing his family and the people he loved would be put in danger. It gave you an inside look to what our government is hiding from us, and what they lie about to protect the American people, even if it could cause more harm than good. It also showed how media can shift our minds into thinking a certain way about a certain thing.
  



McLaughlin, Jenna and Cooper, Talya. “New Film Tells the Story of Edward Snowden Here Are   the Surveillance Programs He Helped Expose” The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2016/09/16/new-film-tells-the-story-of-edward-snowden-here-are-the-surveillance-programs-he-helped-expose/

Scott, A.O. “Review: ‘Snowden’, Oliver Stone’s Restrained Portrait of a Whistleblower.” New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/16/movies/snowden-review-oliver-stone-joseph-gordon-levitt.html?_r=0




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.